Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Sherwinter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1997No. A97A0636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Ilse Schulz retained Emily Sherwinter to represent her in a divorce action. Apparently unhappy with the result of that case, Schulz later sued Sherwinter for legal malpractice, alleging Sherwinter failed to provide her with information relevant to the case and then settled the case without authority and against her interests. On the second day of trial in this malpractice action, outside of the jury’s presence, the trial judge remarked that the trial was progressing very slowly. The court asked: “If. . . Mrs. Schulz agreed to this settlement in [the divorce case] . . . that’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loper v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Le Twigge, Ltd. v. Wammock & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Ingram v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kothari v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Ferqueron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API