Legal Opinion

Nichamin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1920No. 3344PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Harry Nichamin. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant was convicted upon an indictment charging him with unlawfully, feloniously, and knowingly buying, receiving, and having in his possession, knowing the same to have been stolen, and with intent to convert the same to his own use, five ingots of copper, each bearing the letters, “B. & M.” which constituted part of an interstate shipment from Black Eagle, Mont., to Detroit, Mich.

[1] To this indictment the defendant filed a motion to quash for the reason that the words, “with intent to convert .the same to his own use,” charge larceny, which is an offense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Sandals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Tapack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. J. Stacey Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Willie Lee Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Landay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API