Legal Opinion

Cosmo Dress, Inc. v. Perlstein Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1938No. Appeal, 264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Plaintiff, a dress manufacturer, made five shipments of dresses to the defendant between September 1st and October 22, 1936. On October 28th, defendant attempted to return thirty-one dresses, having a total value of $116.25. Plaintiff refused to accept the return shipment as a credit, and so notified the defendant.

On November 9, 1936, defendant mailed a check for $311.45 to the plaintiff as the amount due after deducting $116.25, which had the following notation on its face:' “By endorsement this check is accepted in full payment of the following account......”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schuttinger v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Danish Pride Milk Products Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bernstein v. HirschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Dimmick v. Banning, Cooper & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Tete Bros. v. EshlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucacher v. KersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Hayden v. CoddingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. National Container Corp. v. Regal Corrugated Box Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Chaffin v. BittinskySupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  5. Bell v. MainDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API