Legal Opinion

Behrendt v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1936No. Docket No. 108, Calendar No. 39,045PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

At the general election, held November 6, 1934, plaintiff Henry Behrendt and defendant Thomas C. Wilcox were the opposing candidates for the office of sheriff of Wayne county. From the early, and unofficial, returns it became apparent that the race between the two would be exceedingly close, although the combined votes were about 350,-000 in the 1083 election precincts of the county.

Under the provisions of the Michigan election law (Act No. 351, Pub. Acts 1925 [1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2747 et seq.], as amended) the board of county canvassers is required to meet on the third day after election…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Harbaugh v. People ex rel. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Wilson v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Investigation Into Conduct of Recount & Investigation of the November, 1934Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. InmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Torkelson v. ByrneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Peplinski v. KleinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API