Legal Opinion
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ivax Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 4, 2000No. Civ. 98-1412PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Bristol-Myers Squibb (“Bristol”), a drug manufacturer, has sued Zenith Goldline and IVAX Corporation for infringement of two patents 1 owned by Bristol that claim methods of using the anti-cancer drug Tax-ol®, a drug based on a natural agent known as paclitaxel. The plaintiff alleges that Zenith Goldline, with the assistance of IVAX, has filed Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) 75-297 with the Food and Drug Administration, to request approval to market paclitaxel. Bristol claims that the filing of the ANDA constitutes infringement of Bristol’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Garlanger v. VerbekeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Johnson & Johnson v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Immunex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.