Wilkinson v. Paddock
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court. The order was affirmed on the opinion of Justice Martin at general term. The following is his opinion:
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, J
This was an action of foreclosure. There was a surplus of $117,642.46 arising from the sale herein. *412This surplus was directed by the court to be deposited in certain specified banks or trust companies in the names of Charles E. Hubbell and Alfred K. Hiscock, as receivers of the property of J. Forman Wilkinson and Alfred Wilkinson, subject to the order of the court in which this action was brought.
Subsequently, upon notice to the appellants and other parties having judgments or other liens upon the property of J. Forman and Alfred Wilkinson, and upon the petition of Conrad Loos, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chautauque County Bank v. . RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Malloney v. . HoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Underwood v. . SutcliffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Mutual Life Insurance v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Littlefield v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.