Legal Opinion

Loflin v. Ault

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. 34,027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to quiet title to real estate, and from a judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendants appeal, the questions here presented all depending on whether an oil and gas lease, by reason of concurrent and supplemental contracts for its delivery and performance, was longer in effect.

Plaintiff owned 800 acres of land, and he and other landowners executed oil and gas leases to defendant Ault. The lease executed *341by plaintiff was dated March 5, 1935, was of usual form, and provided that if no well be commenced on or before March 5,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoup v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Kinsley Milling Co. v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Blomberg v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Stanley v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Akers v. PapstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  2. Barton v. HackneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Fulmer v. HallbauerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API