Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 15, 1959No. [No. 142, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brun£, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Roberts, an indigent defendant, represented in this Court by counsel appointed by the Court pursuant to § 15A of Article 5 of the 1957 Code, 1958 Supp., appeals from his conviction on a charge of assault and battery. He urges that paragraphs b and c of Maryland Rule 723 1 relating to a defendant’s right to counsel in the trial court were not complied with and that because of the lack of counsel an ingredient of unfairness entered into the proceedings resulting in his conviction and incarceration and that he was thus denied due process of law in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Uveges v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Carter v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Edwardsen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Shade v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Mateen v. SaarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API