Legal Opinion

Dowdy v. Palmour

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 1982No. 63989; 63990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

Contempt. Appellants Dowdy and McDonald are attorneys-at-law who practice in the Hall County Superior Court. In August, 1981, both appellants represented a criminal defendant in a revocation of probation hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, as the first witness for the state was being called, appellants invoked the rule of sequestration. The trial court ordered all witnesses in the proceedings to come forward, be sworn and retire from the courtroom until called. The prosecution witnesses appeared as ordered. No defense witnesses appeared nor did counsel for defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bradley v. State ex rel. Solicitor-GeneralSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Plunkett v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Maples v. SeeligerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Dowdy v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Maples v. SeeligerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API