Legal Opinion

Carrie R. Schroeder v. Oveta Culp Hobby, Federal Security Administrator

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1955No. 5055PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this case presents the question whether Carrie R. Schroeder is entitled to mother’s insurance benefits under section 202(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 64 Stat. 477, 485, 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(g), which provides in presently pertinent part that every former wife divorced of an individual who died a fully or currently insured individual after 1939, if such former wife divorced (1) has not remarried, (2) is not entitled to widow’s insurance benefit, (3) is not entitled to old-age insurance benefits, (4) has filed application for mother’s insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Golden v. GoldenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Stephens v. Federal Security AdministratorDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1949
  4. Baetich v. HobbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. Cassan v. CassanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Blanscet v. RibicoffDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  2. Randall v. FlemmingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1961
  3. Wray v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  4. Smith v. VowellDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974
  5. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Aleen E. BallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API