Legal Opinion

Keiffer v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 28, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirming.

*384This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the former appeal is found in 132 Ky., 419. It was there held that the trial judge should have peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendant, as, under the state of facts proven, plaintiff failed to make out a case. The facts are fully stated in that opinion.

Upon the last trial the evidence as to how the collision occurred was practically the same as upon the former trial, and at the conclusion thereof the court instruct ed the jury to find for the defendant, which was done.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. KeifferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Austin's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Union Cen. Life Ins. v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Stewart's Administratrix v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Collins v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MinkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Thacker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API