Myrick v. Peeden
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COZORT, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals a jury verdict finding that she was not entitled to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident due to her own contributory negligence. Plaintiff claims the issue of contributory negligence was improperly submitted to the jury; we agree. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Plaintiff Doris Peel Myrick filed this action against defendant Selena Rose Peeden to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained arising out of an automobile accident which occurred 15 June 1989, in Greensboro, North Carolina. Plaintiff’s evidence at trial tended to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snead v. HollomanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Currin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Tharpe v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Spears v. Service Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cicogna v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Minks ex rel. Minks v. North Carolina Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994