Legal Opinion

Myrick v. Peeden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1994No. 9218SC966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a jury verdict finding that she was not entitled to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident due to her own contributory negligence. Plaintiff claims the issue of contributory negligence was improperly submitted to the jury; we agree. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Plaintiff Doris Peel Myrick filed this action against defendant Selena Rose Peeden to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained arising out of an automobile accident which occurred 15 June 1989, in Greensboro, North Carolina. Plaintiff’s evidence at trial tended to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snead v. HollomanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Currin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Tharpe v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Spears v. Service Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cicogna v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Minks ex rel. Minks v. North Carolina Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API