Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Isgrig

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1957No. 5-1251PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This is a suit involving lands in Sections 22, 23 and 24, in Township 1 North, Range 11 "West, in Pulaski County. All the parties to this litigation concede that these present lands are accretions.1

Appellees, W. B. Isgrig and Southern Investment Company, filed this suit against appellant, W. H. Griffin. Isgrig claimed that he owned the E % of Sec. 22; the S % SW % Sec. 23; the Frl. SE % See. 23; and the Frl. NW % Sec. 23, together with all accretions. The Southern Investment Company claimed that it owned the N % SW % Sec. 23 and the S % SW % NW % Sec. 24,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crill v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Connerly v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. KizerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Sturgis v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Rinke v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Coons v. LawlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Hill v. SurrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API