Legal Opinion
Dayton v. Dulles
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 1956No. Civ. A. 4890-55PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGARRAGHY, District Judge.
This is a proceeding in which the plaintiff prays for a judgment declaring (a) that he is entitled to a passport under the statutes of the United States; (b) that the passport regulations and rules of the Board of Passport Appeals are unlawful, invalid and illegal; (c) enjoining defendant (the Secretary of State) from continuing to deny a passport to plaintiff; and (d) directing defendant to issue a passport to plaintiff forthwith in standard form and for standard duration.
The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendant Secretary of State filed his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dayton v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Weldon Bruce Dayton v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Dayton v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Weldon Bruce Dayton v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958