Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Vernon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Cqurt of DeKalb. Heard before the Hon. S. K. McSpaddbn. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

— The original bill was filed to foreclose, a mortgage, executed in this State, on real estate here situate, to secure the payment of a debt contracted with th.e. “American Building, Loan & Investment Society,”. a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois. A motion was made to dismiss the bill for want of equity, ■ because it-did not aver that- at- the time of the execution of the mortgage, the corporation had filed in the office of the secretary of State, pursuant to the statute, approved February 28, 1887, (Pamph. Acts, 1886-8, p. 102'), an instrument in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Duckworth v. Duckworth's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Christian v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Nelms v. Edinburg American Land Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Ginn v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Shepherd v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Johnson Service Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Redfield v. First Nat. Bank of Brigham CityUtah Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API