Legal Opinion

Beitz v. Hereford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1950No. 37,865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries.- Plaintiff prevailed and defendants appeal.

Appellants, C, B. Hereford and R. T. Hereford, his son, were partners doing business as The Hereford Motor Company. They were engaged in the business of selling and repairing motor vehicles in a building located on the southeast’ corner of the intersection of Seventh and Merchant streets in the city of Emporia. Appellants rented the building from its owner, Katherine Whité, who, under the terms of the lease was required to maintain' the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Hurla ex rel. Hurla v. Capper Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co. v. BarrieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bright v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Belger Cartage Service, Inc. v. Holland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Kleppe v. PrawlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Nissula v. Southern Idaho Timber Protective Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Coleman v. S. Patti Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API