Legal Opinion

Miner v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 30, 1936No. 7682PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLZER, District Judge.

This is a motion to quash service of summons made upon the defendant’s statutory agent in California. The complaint discloses that the action is one for damages for wrongful death caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant committed in the state of Wyoming. The defendant is a foreign corporation engaged in the business of a common carrier, both, in interstate commerce and intrastate commerce within the state of California. While the complaint alleges that the defendant sold the decedent a round-trip passage from Chicago, 111., to Los Angeles, Cal., and return,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Breck Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Clarendon Boat Oar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Dunn v. Cedar Rapids Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  3. Steinberg v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Gray Line Tours v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Moore v. National Hotel Management Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API