Chapman v. York
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This appeal is from a final decree ordering the real estate described in the bill sold for division among the parties to the suit as tenants in common. It is insisted the demurrer to the bill as amended should have been sustained upon the theory that, although complainant also owned an interest in the reversion, he also owned the entire life estate of his mother, who is still living, and no sale for division could be had. Upon this question we rest content upon the holding of this court on for mer appeal in this cause, to the effect that the bill could be maintained. Chapman v. York, 208 Ala.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Dee v. DeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Prestwood v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Kelly v. DeeganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Etheredge v. EtheredgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Brugh v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Adams v. Mathieson Alabama Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Brugh v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.