Legal Opinion

Lawrence National Bank v. Kowalsky

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1894No. 15486PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment against him. The appeal is brought here upon the judgment-roll, which does not contain any bill of exceptions. The court below overruled a general demurrer to the complaint, and the appellant claims that this ruling was erroneous, and that the judgment should be reversed upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The plaintiff sues as. assignee of one Pendleton, and the complaint alleges, among other matters, that " on the 17th day of April, 1891, the said defendant was indebted to W. H. Pendleton,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. StrobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Cashman v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bank of Commerce v. BogySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hunt v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Eva v. AndersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API