Arrington v. Wainwright
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
452 So.2d 1120 (1984)
Marie Dean ARRINGTON, Petitioner,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Sec. of Dept. of Corrections; Marta Villacorta, Superintendent of Broward Correctional Institution, and Jim Smith, Atty. General, Respondents.
No. 84-231.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 13, 1984.
Marie Dean Arrington, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and William D. Hall, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondents.
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
We treat this as a petition for writ of mandamus, grant the petition and direct respondents to conduct a hearing within thirty days to determine whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wright v. EnomotoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John W. McQueen v. J.A. Tabah, W.D. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. v. AultDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Bradshaw v. SandlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007