Legal Opinion

Heider v. Unicume

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1933Published

1Opinion

On the Merits

(20 P. (2d) 384)

Frank Holmes, of McMinnville (Otto W. Heider, of Sheridan, on the brief), for appellant. B. A. Kliks, of McMinnville, for respondent. BAILEY, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff against defendant William Unieume and L. M. Kramer for an alleged balance due on a promissory note for $2,500 dated November 11, 1929, payable to plaintiff in monthly instalments of not less than $75 and signed 'by the defendants. The cause was tried to the court and jury, and a judgment was rendered in favor of defendant Unieume. After the entry of the judgment and before notice of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Brown v. WorthingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Leflore County v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Guinn v. Sumpter Valley Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API