Legal Opinion

Watzlavzick v. D. & A. Oppenheimer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Seeligson.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

D. & A. Oppenheimer instituted this suit against Henry Watzlavzick, Benjamin Dubinski and the Dubinski Electric Works, on a promissory note for $2,000, dated November 13, 1902, payable six months after date, said note having been executed by Henry Watzlavzick to Benjamin Dubinski, and having been endorsed by Dubinski to the Dubinski Electric Works, and by the latter endorsed to D. & A. Oppenheimer. Louis Kaufman intervened in the suit, alleging that the note sued on had been transferred to D. & A. Oppenheimer as collateral security for a debt of about $1,200 due by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Prouty v. MusquizTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Falls Land & Cattle Co. v. ChisholmTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Brown v. Thompson & OhmstedeTexas Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Chapman v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API