Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bridgeport Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1940No. 34,604PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action for conversion of personal property. A demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition was sustained on the ground that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

In their petition plaintiffs alleged that on and prior to January 10, 1936, they were the owners of a steam engine and a “string” of tools used in drilling gas and oil wells, that these chattels were *445situated on a described quarter section of land in Okmulgee county, Oklahoma, and that—

“Some time prior to the year 1936, the exact date of which cannot now be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ambler v. ChoteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Dowell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Ladd v. NystolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Stice v. Beacon Newspaper CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Root Grain Co. v. LivengoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Pratt v. BarnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API