Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Barnard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1944No. 36,211PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

In an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as a result of certain unlawful and wrongful conduct on the part of a number of persons named as defendants one of them demurred to the petition and his demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff acquiesced in the ruling and amended the petition. The same defendant then demurred to the pleading as amended. This demurrer was sustained and plaintiff appeals.

Preliminary allegations of the petition as amended can be summarized as follows:

Prior to May 3, 1940, E. F. Barnard…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Burks v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Force v. BatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Bankers Investment Co. v. Central States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API