Legal Opinion

Florida v. White

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 17, 1999No. 98-223PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act provides that certain forms of contraband, including motor vehicles used in violation of the Act’s provisions, may be seized and potentially forfeited. In this ease, we must decide whether the Fourth Amendment requires the police to obtain a warrant before seizing an automobile from a public place when they have probable cause to believe that it is forfeitable contraband. We hold that it does not.

I

On three occasions in July and August 1993, police officers observed respondent Tyvessel Tyvorus White using his car to deliver cocaine, and thereby developed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Roger Trent v. Steven WadeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rafael Sandoval v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API