Legal Opinion

State v. McDermott

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1986No. 16183Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Petitioner State of Idaho seeks a writ of mandate against respondents Judge McDermott and Susan Pulst (his court reporter) to have a transcript prepared by Pulst free of cost to the state for use in its appeal in the criminal case of State v. Barlow. In short, the Court must determine who is responsible for the costs of preparing a reporter’s transcript when the state appeals in a criminal case. Having reviewed the pertinent statutory provisions, we conclude that the state is responsible for such costs. Therefore, we quash the petition for writ of mandate.

The writ of mandate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Garrett v. ClineIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API