Legal Opinion

Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Garrison

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1317-5827PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

Harry Garrison, as next friend for his minor son, Gerald Garrison, sued the plaintiff in error for damages alleged to have resulted to his said son on account of personal injuries received in a collision occurring in the city of Dallas between an automobile and one of the plaintiff in error’s street cars.

Plaintiff in error, among other defenses, pleaded that the injuries complained of by Gerald Garrison were not the result of any negligence upon its part, but were due to and occasioned by an unavoidable accident. It timely requested submission of this issue, which was refused by the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. RoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Montrief & Montrief v. BraggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Boyles v. McClureTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ButcherTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Russell v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Greer v. ThamanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Blanton v. E. & L. Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wichita Transit Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API