Legal Opinion

Burner v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of West Virginia

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1936No. CC 545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

Recovery for a loss of property by fire is sought under a standard mortgage clause attached to a fire insurance policy. It was issued to' A. F. Reed. He subsequently executed a deed of trust on the property to secure a debt owing The First National Bank of Philippi. The mortgage clause was then attached to the policy providing that loss should be payable to the Bank, “as first mortgagee or trustee” as its interest should appear. The property was sold under the deed of trust; and the Bank became the purchaser and received a deed from the trustee. Seven months later, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Davis v. DaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Turk v. SkilesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Boston Co-operative Bank v. American Central InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong Products Corp. v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. First Virginia Bank—Highlands v. McElweeAlleghany County Circuit Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API