Legal Opinion

United States v. Gal

United States Customs Court

Decided March 18, 1954No. A. R. D. 39; Entry No. 859096/2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The application for review of the decision of the trial court in Reap. Dec. 8119 involves the proper value applicable to a certain shipment of metal-covered paper, 3% inches wide, exported from Germany by the Aluminiumwerk Tscheulin, G. m. b. H. on May 16, 1938. The paper in question was invoiced at U. S. $0.34 per pound, including boxes and packing, insurance, freight to German *658port, consular charges, duty at 5 cents per pound, sea freight, and 15 per centum import duty. The merchandise was entered, however, on the basis of RM 0.7409 per pound, all dutiable charges included.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. United States v. Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Minkap of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Omni Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Peacock Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Chicago Bird & Cage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API