Legal Opinion
Lakemore Plaza, Inc. v. Shoenterprise Corp.
Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas
Decided January 5, 1962No. 35374PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLamneck, J.
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover the sum of $70,000 from the defendant, alleged to be due under a real estate lease and a “Guarantee of Lease,” because of the refusal of a lessee to perform the eonvenants and conditions of said lease which the plaintiff claims in its petition that the defendant guaranteed.
It is alleged in the petition that the plaintiff corporation leased certain premises described in the petition to one Elmer Klopper for a period of ten years on February 20, 1959; that on or about February 20, 1959, he assigned said lease to the Lakemore Shoe Corporation; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooper Bus Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Madison Natl. Bank v. WeberOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Eden Realty Co. v. Weather-Seal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Liquidating Midland Bank v. SteckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Union Trust Co. v. Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lee v. VaughnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Neumeyer v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968