Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1968No. 24639_1Published

1DissentGodbold, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The majority reach a conclusion wholly inconsistent with the purposes of and the policies behind the law governing the effect of a personal judgment upon a subsequent action between the same parties.

In May, 1952 the Reconstruction Finance Corporation loaned $200,000 to E. L. Weissinger Lumber Company, Ltd., a limited partnership. The loan was secured by various collateral. Appellant, together with four other female members of the family, executed a separate written guaranty of payment of the partnership’s note to RFC. Appellant was then 20 years of age and recently…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API