Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Langford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1986No. 85-1217PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Charles Langford appeals his conviction of unarmed bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294. We affirm.

By indictment handed down February 6, 1985, Langford was charged with armed bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(d)). He was tried before a jury and convicted of the lesser included offense of unarmed bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)). On April 19, 1985, the district court granted Langford’s motion for a new trial and permitted his counsel to withdraw upon the latter’s representation that he had “conflicts” with Langford. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Sharon Ann RahmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API