Legal Opinion
Turner Brass Works v. Appliance Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided April 5, 1909No. 28,979PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Turner Brass Works and Ray W. Harroun against the Appliance Manufacturing Company. On final hearing. Decree for complainants.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLS A AT, Circuit Judge.
Complainants seek to restrain defendant from infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 of patent No. 873,544, granted to said Harroun December 10, 1907, on application filed March 29, 1906, for an automobile bumper. The device, as stated by complainant at page 7 of its brief, is duly covered by claims 1, 2, and 3, which read as follows, viz.:
“1. In an automobile bumper, a rail extending across the front of an automobile attached to the frame by horizontal arms running’ through eyebolts • at the frame ends and supported by brackets at the rear ends, backed up by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Anderson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Diamond Drill & Machine Co. v. Kelly Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
- Barnes Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Walworth Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- American Roll-Paper Co. v. WestonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perfection Disappearing Bed Co. v. Murphy Wall Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Miner v. T. H. Symington Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- J. H. Sager Co. v. Emil Grossman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913