State v. Reaves

Through his first five assignments of error defendant challenges the court’s admission of his in-court identification by the prosecuting witness, William Page.

After an extensive voir dire examination the court made findings of fact and concluded that the in-court identification of defendant was based entirely on Page’s observation of defendant at the scene of the robbery and was not tainted by an out-of-court identification that took place when defendant was not represented by counsel and at a time when he had not waived his right to counsel. The court’s findings, which are supported by the…