Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. McNaul
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 22, 2010No. 08-1159-JTMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DONALD W. BOSTWICK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Receiver’s Motion to Compel Baker & McKenzie, L.L.P. to produce all documents responsive to a subpoena issued by the Receiver. (Doc. 825, 826.) Baker & McKenzie has filed a response (Doe. 840); Receiver has filed a reply (Doc. 850); and Baker & McKenzie, with the Court’s permission, has filed a sur-reply. (Doc. 910.) After reviewing the briefs, the Court is prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, the Receiver’s Motion to Compel is hereby GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In January…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Martin v. Valley National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- White v. Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. H-, P.C.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Gray v. Conner Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- MWCB Rock Road, LLC v. C&W Facility Services Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Martley v. Basehor, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Martley v. Basehor, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.