Rialto Irrigating District v. Brandon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
.Van Fleet,
Plaintiff is an irrigation district formed under the law of 1887 (Stats. 1887, p. 29), commonly known as the Wright act, having its location in San Bernardino county. In constructing its works for the purpose of supplying water for irrigation purposes to the inhabitants of the district it was found necessary to complete a proper irrigation system, to lay a certain pipe line, described in the complaint, across lands belonging to the defendants. This action was brought for the purpose of condemning a right of way for such pipe line. Judgment went for plaintiff, condemning the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Cummings v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Dallas v. HallockOregon Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.