Legal Opinion
United States v. Huckley Armstrong, A.K.A. Shorty
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 7, 2003No. 02-14234PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Circuit Judge:
Huckley Armstrong contests the denial of his pro se motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which gives retroactive effect to certain amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lower the sentencing range upon which an earlier sentence was based. 1 Armstrong specifically claimed that he was entitled to a retroactive reduction of his sentence under Amendments 599, 600, and 685.
Although Armstrong had previously filed unsuccessful motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the district court first ruled that Armstrong’s § 3582(c)(2) motion was not a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Tyrone Perez, Also Known as Larry, Also Known as StarkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Thomas Dewayne WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Gregory Randolph BerryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Louis Jean HippolyteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. JerchowerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.