Legal Opinion
Felicia Byars v. City of Austin, Camille Cates Barnett, and Overlin Rodriguez, Ind. & in Their Official Capacities as Officers of the City of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 29, 1995No. 03-94-00211-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
byars
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-94-00211-CV
Felicia Byars, Appellant
v.
City of Austin, Camille Cates Barnett, and Overlin Rodriguez, Individually and in Their Capacities as Officers of the City of Austin, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 92-06533, HONORABLE JAMES R. MEYERS, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant Felicia Byars filed suit against the City of Austin, former City Manager Camille Barnett, and Byars's former supervisor, Overlin Rodriguez (collectively, "appellees"), alleging breach of her employment contract, violation of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.