Legal Opinion

United States v. Enigwe

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2005No. Crim.A. 92-257Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendant, Ifedoo Noble Enigwe’s, Motion to Modify Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Enigwe moves to reduce his sentence in light of Amendment 500 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The Court sets forth only an abbreviated procedural history as pertinent to the pending Motion. A detailed factual and procedural history is included in the Court’s previously reported opinions in this case. See United States v. Enigwe, 2003 WL 151385 at *2-6…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Lisa Gort-DidonatoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Walter Lee Chambers, United States of America v. James Isaac JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Daniel Pedrosa FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API