Legal Opinion

Pena v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), entered January 30, 2003, which denied as premature their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability without prejudice to renewal after the completion of discovery.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The Supreme Court improperly denied as premature the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability as premature (see Gillinder v Hemmes, 298 AD2d 493, 494 [2002];…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bolta v. LohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Cenovski v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Zecca v. RiccardelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Gillinder v. HemmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Parisi v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Nostrand v. FroehlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API