Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Nostrand v. Froehlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 2007Published

1Dissent

Spolzino, J. (dissenting).

Prejudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5002 runs from the date on which “the plaintiffs right to be compensated for the damages he or she sustained becomes fixed in law” (Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540, 544 [1991]). The question presented by this appeal is how that date is defined in an action to recover damages for personal injuries that is governed by the Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law art 51), commonly known as the No-Fault Law. In such a case, as I see it, the plaintiffs entitlement to damages cannot be considered to be…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API