Seaton-Hayden Mines Co. v. Renshaw
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke
This was an action to quiet title in an air compressor usable in mining, apparently under chapter 22 of the Code. While we seriously doubt the propriety of the form, on the ground that actions to quiet title on personal property do not lie (Central Sav. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Amalgamated Society, etc., 24 Colo. App. 438, 134 Pac. 1007), no good purpose would be served in dismissing it for that reason. The issues are comparatively simple, and both parties join in asking that the matter be decided on the typewritten briefs submitted on the application for supersedeas, although the supersedeas has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dubois v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Robert E. Lee S. M. Co. v. EnglebachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Carper v. RisdonColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
- Central Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Amalgamated Society of Carpenters & JoinersColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrews v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Keller Cattle Co. v. AllisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Grote v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Midwest Fuel & Timber Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Webb v. Empire Chief Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938