Dyson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
The defendant complains that the trial judge erred in permitting the introduction of additional evidence after the jury had begun its deliberations, and in denying the defen dant the opportunity to cross-examine the witness who provided the additional evidence. The State denies that the nonverbal communication by the witness constituted additional evidence. In the alternative, the State argues that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in permitting additional evidence, and that the defendant waived his right to cross-examine the witness.
I
The victim was awakened at…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- United States v. John Katsougrakis, John HiotisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- People v. OlsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. BoozeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.