Legal Opinion

State v. Booze

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1994No. 32, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The issue presented in this case requires us once again to test the limits of a trial court’s discretion to permit the State to reopen its case in chief at the rebuttal stage of the trial. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City permitted the State to reopen its case at that stage of the trial to present the testimony of a witness, about whom, including the contents of his testimony, it was aware before it closed its case. At the instance of the respondents, Donald Eugene Booze, Jr. and Allen Shelton Snead, the Court of Special Appeals held that ruling to be an abuse of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. People v. OlsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Schlossman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Cecilia Schwaber Trust Two v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity, Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API