Commonwealth v. Sampson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
LALLY-GREEN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Kareem Sampson, appeals from the order denying his PCRA 1 petition on November 4, 2004, without a hearing. We affirm.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of the case are as follows:
In March of 1999, [Appellant] telephoned Natise Johnson to question her about her brother’s relationship with [Appellant’s former fiancée, Crystal Mack. [1] Unhappy with Natise Johnson’s responses, [Appellant] went to Na-tise Johnson’s home located at 5428 Lansdowne Avenue, in the City and County of Philadelphia. Natise Johnson had known [Appellant since middle school, so…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SanduskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. JudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SolomonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.