Legal Opinion
Helm v. Helm (In Re Helm)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 15, 1985No. 19-30379PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue addressed by this opinion is whether 28 U.S.C. § 1293, 1 which allows a final judgment, order, or decree of a Bankruptcy Court to be directly appealed to a Federal Court of Appeals, was repealed by the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984 [hereinafter referred to as the 1984 Amendments Act]. The question comes before us as part of the bitterly contested dischargeability case of Helm v. Helm, decided today in a companion opinion. For the reasons stated below, we hold that 28 U.S.C. § 1293 was repealed by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. HooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- In Re BremerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
- In Re PickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
- In Re PerdueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1988
- In Re RadinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.