Legal Opinion

Richard I. Krodel v. John J. Houghtaling

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1972No. 72-1094PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appellant sued the defendants for malicious interference with his contract rights, and on this appeal challenges four rulings of the district court: (1) denial of plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial, (2) denial of his motion for a continuance, (3) dismissal of the action for lack of prosecution, and (4) denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure preserve the right of trial by jury, Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(a), a timely demand for a jury trial must be filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b), (d). Since the plaintiff failed to file such a demand, the district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Weyerhaeuser Company v. Bucon Construction Company, Inc., and Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Timmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Edwin Jones Montgomery, Sr. And Dorothy Scott Montgomery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ramos González v. Félix MedinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  2. Jacobs v. College of William and MaryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
  3. Earl Realty, Inc. v. Leonetti (In Re Leonetti)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. New York Pizzeria, Inc. v. SyalDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  5. Frederick v. KoziolDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API