Legal Opinion

Kipling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2014No. 13-1389PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The question before us is one of conflict of laws. Plaintiff Kathryn Kipling sued State Farm Automobile Insurance Company in Colorado federal district court for breach of contract because it did not pay her benefits under four insurance policies issued in Minnesota. The court determined that she would be entitled to benefits under Colorado law but not under Minnesota law. It then applied tort con-fliet-of-laws principles to rule that Colorado law governed. We hold that the court erred by not applying contract conflict-of-laws principles. With appellate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sprint Nextel Corp. v. Middle Man, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Gordon v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  3. Archangel Diamond Corp. Liquidating Trust v. OAO LukoilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Selco Community Credit Union v. Noodles & Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  5. Kipling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API