Legal Opinion

Miele v. Greyling

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 31, 1995No. 94 Civ. 3674 (WK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.

This is a securities fraud class action and shareholders derivative suit. Plaintiff is suing defendants Arthur S. Feher, Jr. (“Feher”) and James R. Leone (“Leone”) (collectively, the “defendants”) both as individuals and in their capacities as officers and directors of corporate defendant Members Ser*108vice Corporation (“MSC”), a Colorado holding company with principal offices in Florida. Feher and Leone each move pro se to dismiss for failure to state a claim and failure to join an indispensible party. For the reasons that follow, both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,357 Marbury Management, Inc., and Harry Bader, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Alfred Kohn, and Wood, Walker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Edwin Kerr v. Compagnie De Ultramar and Transmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. Costello Publishing Co. v. John E. Rotelle, O. S. A. Costello Publishing Co., Inc. v. John E. Rotelle, O. S. A., Episcopal Conference of AustraliaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Borden, Inc. v. Spoor Behrins Campbell & Young, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API