Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 9, 1933No. 6 Div. 214Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing,

KNIGHT, Justice.

We have carefully considered the several briefs presented- on this application for rehearing, some of which contain much caustic criticism of the opinion, upon the theory that a review of the law in the other states of the Union, and obtaining generally elsewhere, is not apropos of the question here presented. But we think counsel have misinterpreted the opinion in this regard, and misconceived the purpose which actuated this review of the law.

It is true that, in our opinion, the writer attempted to review the authorities in the other states of the Union, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. State v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API